I attended a staff meeting today after school that was aimed at getting us ready for upcoming visits from the district. Because my school is so low in scores and high in every sort of need you could imagine, we are under great scrutiny right now - more so than other "regular" schools. The scores all across the board at the school are dismal and depressing, and the students' discouragement is exhibited in the lack of effort and the sometimes mind-boggling behaviors.
Anyway, we were told at the meeting what sorts of things we should definitely be displaying in our classrooms - things that the district big wigs (who probably never taught a class --let alone a class like they would have at my school) would want to see. Most of the requirements are common sense things to incorporate everyday, and then there are the extras that are only for the "dog and pony" effect because the higher-ups think they enhance instruction. (Some of the things do, and some things don't.)
With all the many expectations for which we are held accountable, we at the school all wonder the same thing... Where is the parent accountability? ...and the parents' parents' accountability? ...and the parents' parents' parents' accountability? I think you get my point. There has obviously been an ongoing cycle of people having babies and not actually raising them, so the cycle almost never ends. If a student is never taught to focus on his education, work diligently, respect authority, and is never expected to succeed in life overall, we must face the reality of what happens later on in the life of that student. He goes on eventually to have many children of his own, and he has the same low to no standards with his offspring. If someone can't handle his own life and make something good of it, then he should not be bringing new life into this world ---unless he's planning to give that child the childhood he didn't have - one of love, protection, support (physical, mental, spiritual, etc.), and education. The very moment his efforts are shown to be lacking the aforesaid basics, then his children should be put in the care of those who will ensure the success of the children.
There is no excuse for someone's child to be reading at a second grade level in the fifth grade. Unfortunately, yes--there are bad teachers. It shouldn't be the case, just as we shouldn't have bad parents. I guess I must remind myself we don't live in the perfect world. There are circumstances where one child might have had one teacher who was not the best--maybe even two teachers, but I'm sorry-- a PARENT starts teaching his/her child practically the moment the baby's eyes open. If a parent has a teacher who isn't doing his/her job, then he/she should stand up for his child's educational rights! It ultimately falls on the parents.
There are children with mental defects, but they are not as numerous as the scores from each one of our school's children might suggest. It's the lack of essential parenting that puts children into this predicament of low scores and seemingly low ability. In reality, they are capable of so much more, but nothing is reinforced at home by the parents. Therefore, students are left to their own devices, while teachers do their best to raise the bar of expectation that was never introduced at home.
So, where are the parents? The fact is many "parents" shouldn't be parents. Please notice my distinction there. Almost anyone can be a "parent," but it takes a well-rounded, kind-hearted, hard-working, and dare I say educated human being to be a parent. I was born, raised, and still live in Pine Hills (known as "the ghetto" to most people), so I know what outside influences I'm battling each day at my neighborhood school. But even though I lived in such a place, I turned out just fine (I hope you agree--if you know me :)), so I know success can be reached. I just sometimes wonder how --when many of my students don't have the love and support (and shelter--figuratively and literally) that I had growing up. They are caught up in a cycle they cannot keep from spiraling out of control. I pray that my efforts somehow reach them and change them for the better.
I work hard and put in long hours trying to get every bit of information crammed into each student's brain in a way that works for their individual skills and interests. Oftentimes, in my particular environment, I see the fruits of my labor. There are also times when I don't. I cannot force a child to learn. At some point, it is that child's responsibility (and yes--the parents' responsibility) to ensure he/she is taking full advantage of what I offer. Why, then, do the district people not visit the parents? Are they checking to see if the parents are feeding their children, giving them encouragement, conferencing with the teacher, providing feedback on their child's progress, etc.? No. It all falls on the teachers.
Please do not read the above paragraphs and think that in some way I am trying to suggest that I should not have to answer to anyone. I fully expect and encourage others to keep all teachers in check. With such a demanding career, I knew that my life would be changed forever, and I take the good and the bad in stride. I do, however, believe that I should have the support of the community in which I teach. Give kids what they need to be successful! If you are a parent, step up to the plate! I should never hear the sad stories of students who steal snacks from the teacher because he's not fed at home. Students should not being throwing desks and chairs in an angry rage just because they were reprimanded. Getting an attitude and refusing to follow simple directions like 'follow along in your book' should not be the norm. And yet... All of those have happened. The most serious of those are not even the worst stories that I have heard from my colleagues and/or have experienced myself.
Again, when I signed up for this job, I knew what kind of school and neighborhood I was embracing. And I still fully embrace it. People have asked me, "Why don't you go to another school?" Well, the truth is this is where I am most needed. I might come home exhausted and wondering why the world is the way it is, but my passion to teach keeps me begging for more challenges the next day. I have no regrets, and I must keep trudging on and working to better myself and my students. With or without parent support, I am expected to develop miracles in the classroom. So, daily, I plant the seeds and water them until one day I see them in full bloom. I just pray that God intervenes (somehow through me --in part) in the lives of my students, so that the cycle of "parent-less" parenting crumbles and a new cycle of hope, respect, and education take priority over all despicable earthly motives and routines.
Boredom Leads Me to Blogging
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (1)
A friend of mine has a blog site, where she posts pics of her daily outfits. ((http://aworkingmomscloset.blogspot.com)) It's a cool idea that I could probably get into doing easily. I love cute outfits! However, since I'm a teacher, and it's summertime, I'd have to post lots of "pajama day" pictures if I truly did it daily. :-D
I started out just looking at my friend's site, and then I was drawn to other style sites of which she is a fan. It's interesting to see the individual styles created from pieces that are available to everyone in stores around the country. A lot of people have some real guts to wear some of the things they come up with. I'm not that brave and adventurous most of the time, but I still like to think I look good in spite of my tendency to play it safe.
Questions:
1. Should I do the 'daily wear' postings?
2. What should the next topic on my blog be?
**********
Well, here I am, running out of things to say already... So much for this blog saving me from boredom.
I started out just looking at my friend's site, and then I was drawn to other style sites of which she is a fan. It's interesting to see the individual styles created from pieces that are available to everyone in stores around the country. A lot of people have some real guts to wear some of the things they come up with. I'm not that brave and adventurous most of the time, but I still like to think I look good in spite of my tendency to play it safe.
Questions:
1. Should I do the 'daily wear' postings?
2. What should the next topic on my blog be?
**********
Well, here I am, running out of things to say already... So much for this blog saving me from boredom.
Respect
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (2)
Well, it's about time I blogged! I just got back from a great trip to the Dominican Republic--my first time off the North American continent. :) I decided that I would blog about one of the things I experienced while I was there--just because I think it's an important thing to cover at least once in my blog. I'll begin with a question...
Do I look like a dog or a cat?
In America, some men whistle when they spot a woman they think is attractive. Isn't whistling done to get a dog's attention? In the Dominican Republic, the men do some sort of hissing or clicking noise--accompanied by enough English to get the message across to me that they are desperate pigs. Isn't that clicking noise used to get a cat's attention? According to the tour guide book, Dominicans do that in their culture (although I've had this problem in America too). I want to know why it is a part of any culture. Where did the idea of women being like meat come from? I'm curious (George). Every male comes from a woman, and I'm sure that their mothers did not teach them to treat women like that, so what the heck?!
Also, I would like to know what kind of reaction those men are expecting to get from me. Do they expect me to run over and give them a big smooch on the lips? Do they think I'm going to smile, and whistle right back at them? Do they think I'm going to give them a lap dance or something? Whatever it is they are imagining is not going to happen--so why bother, guys? I don't understand the thinking or lack thereof that is occurring in their minds.
I'm not a streetwalker or mindless bimbo, so don't treat me like I have no respect for myself or like there is no reason for me to have your respect. Sure, I know it's natural to 'check people out' and acknowledge the outer beauty they may exhibit, but can't it be done tastefully? Yes--I know it can--I've done it. Ok--so that problem is solved. Let's try it then, guys! Have some respect---both for the women you see and for yourselves for cryin' out loud.
I know today's culture (seemingly everywhere) portrays chauvinism as an okay thing. Examples: music industry, commercials for just about anything, movies, (so basically --Hollywood--)... I think it's time for upstanding women AND men to put an end to this acceptance. People, tell your kids to treat others with respect, so we can stop this ridiculousness!!!
Ahhh...sometimes it just feels good to vent!
Do I look like a dog or a cat?
In America, some men whistle when they spot a woman they think is attractive. Isn't whistling done to get a dog's attention? In the Dominican Republic, the men do some sort of hissing or clicking noise--accompanied by enough English to get the message across to me that they are desperate pigs. Isn't that clicking noise used to get a cat's attention? According to the tour guide book, Dominicans do that in their culture (although I've had this problem in America too). I want to know why it is a part of any culture. Where did the idea of women being like meat come from? I'm curious (George). Every male comes from a woman, and I'm sure that their mothers did not teach them to treat women like that, so what the heck?!
Also, I would like to know what kind of reaction those men are expecting to get from me. Do they expect me to run over and give them a big smooch on the lips? Do they think I'm going to smile, and whistle right back at them? Do they think I'm going to give them a lap dance or something? Whatever it is they are imagining is not going to happen--so why bother, guys? I don't understand the thinking or lack thereof that is occurring in their minds.
I'm not a streetwalker or mindless bimbo, so don't treat me like I have no respect for myself or like there is no reason for me to have your respect. Sure, I know it's natural to 'check people out' and acknowledge the outer beauty they may exhibit, but can't it be done tastefully? Yes--I know it can--I've done it. Ok--so that problem is solved. Let's try it then, guys! Have some respect---both for the women you see and for yourselves for cryin' out loud.
I know today's culture (seemingly everywhere) portrays chauvinism as an okay thing. Examples: music industry, commercials for just about anything, movies, (so basically --Hollywood--)... I think it's time for upstanding women AND men to put an end to this acceptance. People, tell your kids to treat others with respect, so we can stop this ridiculousness!!!
Ahhh...sometimes it just feels good to vent!
Entertainment vs. Worship
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (3)
These days, some people claim that “young people’s” [generalization] idea of worship is to hear a rock-like band and to be “entertained” essentially. But as a “young person” myself, I tend to disagree with this generalization somewhat but to ask “so what?” at the same time. I have a dual sense of worship because of my upbringing in a traditional church and because of my being introduced to modern worship and contemporary worship music in my early teen years. Why discount someone’s worship experience just because it’s different or more “contemporary”?
As an elementary education major in college, I was told over and over to create lesson plans that were both educational and fun. So I say why not do the same with worship experiences? I love pomp and circumstance and good ol’ tradition very much, but I find nothing wrong with using contemporary music, technology, and such to spice things up a bit. What does it hurt? If anything, I think it boosts the experience. We in the younger generation have grown up with all sorts of media, and it’s a big part of our lives. To expect us to walk into a church where none of that media is present and expect us to come back and feel like we are even considered a part of the crowd is a bit naïve.
My church currently has kids leave the traditional worship service and go for a more entertaining means of learning about Biblical teachings. On one hand, this is a great service to our young people, but on the other hand it’s doing them a great disservice in the long run—as well as to the church. Why? Two reasons. One: The kids are missing out on the tradition and regular worship experience offered by the church each Sunday. Two: The church is continuing to do traditional worship only, while training its kids to expect fun and interactive worship experiences. And once the kids graduate from the children’s moment and find themselves sitting in the pews for a regular service with no interaction or media of any sort, they (the older congregants) shouldn’t be shocked when the kids grow up and don’t come back. Very few youth are like myself—content in traditional surroundings every Sunday. Nowadays, I even find myself at times longing for more contemporary injections into the experience every once in a while.
In my view, as long as a worship service includes real worship, tradition, contemporary elements, fellowship, and acceptance, there can be no argument that the focus is not on God. Having a screen with hymn lyrics or Bible verses on it, clapping, guitar-playing, and the like do not make for an “entertain me only” experience. It just opens the doors to a more diverse group of congregants. And I don’t see why anyone of any age would discourage that possibility.
I can worship God in a variety of settings, so I know that others can too. I can pray in my car or at the altar, sing in the traditional choir, sing along to a new contemporary worship song being projected onto a screen, recite the Apostle’s Creed, and more. No experience out-shines another in my mind. As long as I focus on the true meaning of my actions, I cannot lose sight of the purpose of my being there.
Jesus himself made His own Commandments more understandable and more easily acceptable by telling parables or stories. He humanized His messages so that we might better relate to His Commandments. For this reason also, I don’t believe that adding to traditional worship methods is offensive to God. Obviously, I can’t speak for Him, but I know that He accepts us as we are, and we are called to do the same and to proclaim His Word using any method necessary.
We have cantatas and children’s plays to illustrate God’s Word in a somewhat contemporary –traditional manner, and yet this doesn’t seem to be viewed by the overly traditional supporters as entertainment—because it isn’t! These are a couple of our human ways to worship the Lord. Again, as long as the focus is on Him, what’s wrong with maybe having a band with guitars and [gasp!] drums? Nothing.
It is time for church-goers and church leaders everywhere to wake up and smell the Starbucks cappuccino (or just regular Lipton’s sweet tea—if they’re more like me). The new age of worship is upon us, and if we choose to ignore it, our society will continue to spiral into an abyss of Godless people.
As an elementary education major in college, I was told over and over to create lesson plans that were both educational and fun. So I say why not do the same with worship experiences? I love pomp and circumstance and good ol’ tradition very much, but I find nothing wrong with using contemporary music, technology, and such to spice things up a bit. What does it hurt? If anything, I think it boosts the experience. We in the younger generation have grown up with all sorts of media, and it’s a big part of our lives. To expect us to walk into a church where none of that media is present and expect us to come back and feel like we are even considered a part of the crowd is a bit naïve.
My church currently has kids leave the traditional worship service and go for a more entertaining means of learning about Biblical teachings. On one hand, this is a great service to our young people, but on the other hand it’s doing them a great disservice in the long run—as well as to the church. Why? Two reasons. One: The kids are missing out on the tradition and regular worship experience offered by the church each Sunday. Two: The church is continuing to do traditional worship only, while training its kids to expect fun and interactive worship experiences. And once the kids graduate from the children’s moment and find themselves sitting in the pews for a regular service with no interaction or media of any sort, they (the older congregants) shouldn’t be shocked when the kids grow up and don’t come back. Very few youth are like myself—content in traditional surroundings every Sunday. Nowadays, I even find myself at times longing for more contemporary injections into the experience every once in a while.
In my view, as long as a worship service includes real worship, tradition, contemporary elements, fellowship, and acceptance, there can be no argument that the focus is not on God. Having a screen with hymn lyrics or Bible verses on it, clapping, guitar-playing, and the like do not make for an “entertain me only” experience. It just opens the doors to a more diverse group of congregants. And I don’t see why anyone of any age would discourage that possibility.
I can worship God in a variety of settings, so I know that others can too. I can pray in my car or at the altar, sing in the traditional choir, sing along to a new contemporary worship song being projected onto a screen, recite the Apostle’s Creed, and more. No experience out-shines another in my mind. As long as I focus on the true meaning of my actions, I cannot lose sight of the purpose of my being there.
Jesus himself made His own Commandments more understandable and more easily acceptable by telling parables or stories. He humanized His messages so that we might better relate to His Commandments. For this reason also, I don’t believe that adding to traditional worship methods is offensive to God. Obviously, I can’t speak for Him, but I know that He accepts us as we are, and we are called to do the same and to proclaim His Word using any method necessary.
We have cantatas and children’s plays to illustrate God’s Word in a somewhat contemporary –traditional manner, and yet this doesn’t seem to be viewed by the overly traditional supporters as entertainment—because it isn’t! These are a couple of our human ways to worship the Lord. Again, as long as the focus is on Him, what’s wrong with maybe having a band with guitars and [gasp!] drums? Nothing.
It is time for church-goers and church leaders everywhere to wake up and smell the Starbucks cappuccino (or just regular Lipton’s sweet tea—if they’re more like me). The new age of worship is upon us, and if we choose to ignore it, our society will continue to spiral into an abyss of Godless people.
My Account of Inauguration Day – Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (0)
I’m typing this blog as I watch the inauguration live on the television…
There are so many people in D.C.! It’s a sea of Americans.
Aretha Franklin singing “My Country Tis of Thee” ????? Why? Baaaad….ugh! It sounds like a man (who couldn’t carry a tune in a bucket) doing a Saturday Night Live-style joke version of a singer. Wow.
Rick Warren is saying the invocation. Screaming during a prayer?
So many people don’t understand the magnitude of this choice of President. Some just see that he is a black man. This point is partially explained by remembering my former students’ excitement over his election win -- for no other reason than because he is black—not because of his accomplishments in life, intelligence, or hard work—only his skin color. This is because my students’ parents and so many other Americans are uninformed and, by choice, do not care to look at policy, ideology, or beliefs but rather, they identify and focus only on color.
Don’t get me wrong, I think it is wonderful for history to be made by having an African-American President, but I could have waited another four years for one I could actually agree with and have “hope” in. Same with a woman President – it will be a wonderful addition to United States history eventually, but I don’t want one for just history’s sake; I want one who will actually be good for the country.
I did not want Barack Obama to be President. Heck, I didn’t even want McCain! But I will support Obama only because he is going to be in charge of my country.
And here we go right now—Obama is about to take the Oath of Office. History. He’s officially President.
[a couple minutes later…] Now he is giving his inaugural address.
As I’m listening to the address and seeing shots of the throng, I’m thinking…well, at least with all this support Barack has, there won’t be so much whining and complaining. It was so annoying to hear people complain about George. I loved George. He was a good President and did so much to keep our country safe.
Break from thought---please, Barack ---promises, promises. Health care and other stuff he’s promising right now…
Anyway, back to what I was saying about George W. Bush. He protected our country, and he is a great American in my eyes. So many people –especially Democrats, of course—complained and complained until they were blue in the face. I’m happy to say that even though many Republicans like myself didn’t want Barack Obama to be President, I guarantee that we won’t react to Obama’s Presidency like many fools did to Bush’s Presidency. I believe we have more class than that. Sure, there will be some people against Obama who will go nuts; there are always nutty people who can’t control themselves, but I say that we Republican people with brains and understanding will not whine and disrespect the new President.
Still listening to Barack’s inaugural address… Right now he’s giving a message to other nations…talking about our support and our understanding of the suffering of many nations. Now he’s talking about our heroes. “Guardians of liberty.”
I just checked my Facebook while history is continuing to play out on television… hehe
It’s 20-something degrees in D.C. right now. A throng of people fill the National Mall all the way down to the Washington Monument. There’s no official count or even a guess as to how many people are there right now. According to FOX News, in 1965, there were 1.2 million people out for the LBJ inauguration—the most in history. This inauguration might beat that.
Obama just finished his speech.
People are waving American flags and chanting his name.
Obama just hugged George. Awww… George!!! :( I will miss you!
Now I’m listening to a poem(?) that is being read by some woman in a red coat. I don’t know who she is. I just saw another shot of the crowd. It looks like a lot of people are leaving. Man—that’s going to take forever to get around. I can’t even imagine how the Metro is on this day… I shudder to think of that!
Ah—a shot of American flags. What a beautiful flag and what a wonderful country I live in… I love pomp and circumstance!
Some old guy, Rev. Joseph Lowery, is now giving the benediction.
Yes, Rev. Lowery, God DOES have the whole world in His hands. And that belief is what gives me hope! Hope in all things! God bless and protect our country…
Shouldn’t Barack’s daughters Malia and Sasha be in school? Lol Just kidding…just kidding… :) ;)
The reverend is doing some funny rhyming talking about different colors of people. Lol oook…
Lowery apparently 87 years old. Like they say, “Black don’t crack!” LoL He looks pretty good for that age.
Now the National Anthem is being sung. Beautiful song. There’s the flag again…awesome.
Now the new President and everyone else is clearing out.
I love the Marine Corps Band!
Ugh—there’s Hillary Clinton—soon to be Secretary of State if everything goes through. She wishes this were her inauguration day. Ha! I hope that never happens.
Now Obama is about to see George and Laura off. The Bushes are going to get on a helicopter in a minute. They'll be off to Texas afterwards... And there's Dick and Lynn Cheney. Bye, Bushes and Cheneys! :(
Well, my coverage is over for now...
There are so many people in D.C.! It’s a sea of Americans.
Aretha Franklin singing “My Country Tis of Thee” ????? Why? Baaaad….ugh! It sounds like a man (who couldn’t carry a tune in a bucket) doing a Saturday Night Live-style joke version of a singer. Wow.
Rick Warren is saying the invocation. Screaming during a prayer?
So many people don’t understand the magnitude of this choice of President. Some just see that he is a black man. This point is partially explained by remembering my former students’ excitement over his election win -- for no other reason than because he is black—not because of his accomplishments in life, intelligence, or hard work—only his skin color. This is because my students’ parents and so many other Americans are uninformed and, by choice, do not care to look at policy, ideology, or beliefs but rather, they identify and focus only on color.
Don’t get me wrong, I think it is wonderful for history to be made by having an African-American President, but I could have waited another four years for one I could actually agree with and have “hope” in. Same with a woman President – it will be a wonderful addition to United States history eventually, but I don’t want one for just history’s sake; I want one who will actually be good for the country.
I did not want Barack Obama to be President. Heck, I didn’t even want McCain! But I will support Obama only because he is going to be in charge of my country.
And here we go right now—Obama is about to take the Oath of Office. History. He’s officially President.
[a couple minutes later…] Now he is giving his inaugural address.
As I’m listening to the address and seeing shots of the throng, I’m thinking…well, at least with all this support Barack has, there won’t be so much whining and complaining. It was so annoying to hear people complain about George. I loved George. He was a good President and did so much to keep our country safe.
Break from thought---please, Barack ---promises, promises. Health care and other stuff he’s promising right now…
Anyway, back to what I was saying about George W. Bush. He protected our country, and he is a great American in my eyes. So many people –especially Democrats, of course—complained and complained until they were blue in the face. I’m happy to say that even though many Republicans like myself didn’t want Barack Obama to be President, I guarantee that we won’t react to Obama’s Presidency like many fools did to Bush’s Presidency. I believe we have more class than that. Sure, there will be some people against Obama who will go nuts; there are always nutty people who can’t control themselves, but I say that we Republican people with brains and understanding will not whine and disrespect the new President.
Still listening to Barack’s inaugural address… Right now he’s giving a message to other nations…talking about our support and our understanding of the suffering of many nations. Now he’s talking about our heroes. “Guardians of liberty.”
I just checked my Facebook while history is continuing to play out on television… hehe
It’s 20-something degrees in D.C. right now. A throng of people fill the National Mall all the way down to the Washington Monument. There’s no official count or even a guess as to how many people are there right now. According to FOX News, in 1965, there were 1.2 million people out for the LBJ inauguration—the most in history. This inauguration might beat that.
Obama just finished his speech.
People are waving American flags and chanting his name.
Obama just hugged George. Awww… George!!! :( I will miss you!
Now I’m listening to a poem(?) that is being read by some woman in a red coat. I don’t know who she is. I just saw another shot of the crowd. It looks like a lot of people are leaving. Man—that’s going to take forever to get around. I can’t even imagine how the Metro is on this day… I shudder to think of that!
Ah—a shot of American flags. What a beautiful flag and what a wonderful country I live in… I love pomp and circumstance!
Some old guy, Rev. Joseph Lowery, is now giving the benediction.
Yes, Rev. Lowery, God DOES have the whole world in His hands. And that belief is what gives me hope! Hope in all things! God bless and protect our country…
Shouldn’t Barack’s daughters Malia and Sasha be in school? Lol Just kidding…just kidding… :) ;)
The reverend is doing some funny rhyming talking about different colors of people. Lol oook…
Lowery apparently 87 years old. Like they say, “Black don’t crack!” LoL He looks pretty good for that age.
Now the National Anthem is being sung. Beautiful song. There’s the flag again…awesome.
Now the new President and everyone else is clearing out.
I love the Marine Corps Band!
Ugh—there’s Hillary Clinton—soon to be Secretary of State if everything goes through. She wishes this were her inauguration day. Ha! I hope that never happens.
Now Obama is about to see George and Laura off. The Bushes are going to get on a helicopter in a minute. They'll be off to Texas afterwards... And there's Dick and Lynn Cheney. Bye, Bushes and Cheneys! :(
Well, my coverage is over for now...
$chool Wa$te
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (0)
At the moment, I have no internet, so I'm blogging on WordPad, and then I'll post it on the following blog on my page when the modem arrives in the mail.
Today's subject: $chool Wa$te
Schools this year--more than any year I had ever been aware of previously--claim to be majorly pressed for money. 'They' say the coming year is going to be even worse. My question is WHY? I realize that times are hard for most Americans these days, but we're still paying taxes and schools are still getting money (albeit less than before). In some Florida districts, schools are planning to get rid of extracurricular activities like softball--a less popular sport. I'd love to see them try to get rid of football; parents wouldn't hear of that! Even unviersities aren't immune. The University of Florida threatened to get rid of Korean language classes due to money issues. Apparently, those plans are still pending. So why are we having to get rid of certain classes, sports, and clubs? Answer: The school board doesn't know how to manage money--let alone schools.
What are our school board members and schools doing with the money they get? The answer to this one is plain and simple: They're wasting it.
Right now, the people in charge--or the almighty 'they'-- are punishing students--especially those who actually care about their future. A year or two ago, they got rid of busing for students in magnet programs. Now there's a great idea...let's stop busing the smart kids to school just to save money on gas! Keeping driven children out of magnet programs, extracurricular activities, and advanced classes is NOT the way to save on money. But wait--there's more! As a senior intern this past fall 2008 semester, I was appalled to learn that the school I was working at was watering down their soap, and it's not like that soap was even purchased by the school either--it was purchased by the parents! So why water it down to 'save money' when it's not even saving school dollars? Healthy and smart! Another brilliant setup I noticed at the school was found in the lunchroom. The lunchroom staff fills styrofoam cups with whatever unhealthy food is being served that day, and then the kids are supposed to put those cups on top of styrofoam trays. I've got an idea--why don't the lunchladies just dish the food onto the trays and get rid of the styrofoam cups once and for all! Not only are those styrofoam cups costly to schools money-wise, but they're also costly to the environment. As for the styrofoam trays, it would be interesting to see if it would be more cost-effective to just get plastic trays and wash them, but I'll leave that research to someone else.
So you may be (or should be) asking yourself, "Besides getting rid of styrofoam cups, what can be done to cut spending without cutting all the special classes and extracurricular activities?" For starters, let's get rid of the school board or at the very least drastically reduce their control and, of course, pay. They have proven themselves to be less than brilliant when it comes to knowing what to cut, how to handle budgets, and anything and everything connected with schools and money. Their salaries will be a great addition to school budgets. But who will be in charge if the school board is dismissed? Here's an easy one--parents and teachers. Now there's an idea--having people who actually know what's going on being in charge. Let's change the previous school board mass into a larger PTA-like body. Since only interested, educated, and involved parents and teachers will participate, there should be no fear of careless voting on important decisions that will impact student learning.
Besides the change in power, there are simple in-school money saving options. There are the aforementioned styrofoam cups, but schools also waste a lot of money on paper. Too many copies are made because worksheets are overused. If the budget is really as tight as it is portrayed as being, why not get rid of the FCAT--if only for a while? My sister came up with that suggestion, and I agree with it wholeheartedly. Being as involved in schools as I have been, I know firsthand how the FCAT has the potential to squeeze its way into the curriculum and almost totally push out any chance of having fun and meaningful lessons that should be taught on a regular basis. It's not that the test doesn't have things on it that kids don't need to know, it's the approach that teachers are forced (yes, forced) to take to drill the information into the heads of the children, who are ready to burst by the time the test comes around. It creates an unnecessary burden on teachers and students. In addition, it doesn't allow for much leeway when it comes to teachers planning lessons. I could go on about the FCAT, but I digress and will return to my suggestions for money saving options.
Another option is to stop building new schools just on a whim. Of course, this urge could be quelled by getting rid of the build-happy school board members, but I'm including it on my list anyway. Trimming down the professional development requirements would also be a smart way to save money. Oftentimes, those professional development sessions feature old news--things that are taught in colleges and universities. I should know! As a recent graduate from the University of Central Florida (elementary education major) and professional development attendee, I can honestly say I learned very little to almost no new information at all whenever I went to local schools' professional development sessions. The information consisted of topics and suggestions that I had already heard in my college courses. Granted, there are older teachers who may be unfamiliar with some things, but a lot of the information is common sense! If it isn't, all those teachers have to do is ask a colleague for help.
Well, this long blog contains only a start to the possibilities that schools should reach for in an effort to achieve a setup that is based on more common sense, less money, and fewer high-falutin' school leaders. I'm sure I will get riled enough to continue this at a later time. ;) Thanks for reading! Come back soon.
Today's subject: $chool Wa$te
Schools this year--more than any year I had ever been aware of previously--claim to be majorly pressed for money. 'They' say the coming year is going to be even worse. My question is WHY? I realize that times are hard for most Americans these days, but we're still paying taxes and schools are still getting money (albeit less than before). In some Florida districts, schools are planning to get rid of extracurricular activities like softball--a less popular sport. I'd love to see them try to get rid of football; parents wouldn't hear of that! Even unviersities aren't immune. The University of Florida threatened to get rid of Korean language classes due to money issues. Apparently, those plans are still pending. So why are we having to get rid of certain classes, sports, and clubs? Answer: The school board doesn't know how to manage money--let alone schools.
What are our school board members and schools doing with the money they get? The answer to this one is plain and simple: They're wasting it.
Right now, the people in charge--or the almighty 'they'-- are punishing students--especially those who actually care about their future. A year or two ago, they got rid of busing for students in magnet programs. Now there's a great idea...let's stop busing the smart kids to school just to save money on gas! Keeping driven children out of magnet programs, extracurricular activities, and advanced classes is NOT the way to save on money. But wait--there's more! As a senior intern this past fall 2008 semester, I was appalled to learn that the school I was working at was watering down their soap, and it's not like that soap was even purchased by the school either--it was purchased by the parents! So why water it down to 'save money' when it's not even saving school dollars? Healthy and smart! Another brilliant setup I noticed at the school was found in the lunchroom. The lunchroom staff fills styrofoam cups with whatever unhealthy food is being served that day, and then the kids are supposed to put those cups on top of styrofoam trays. I've got an idea--why don't the lunchladies just dish the food onto the trays and get rid of the styrofoam cups once and for all! Not only are those styrofoam cups costly to schools money-wise, but they're also costly to the environment. As for the styrofoam trays, it would be interesting to see if it would be more cost-effective to just get plastic trays and wash them, but I'll leave that research to someone else.
So you may be (or should be) asking yourself, "Besides getting rid of styrofoam cups, what can be done to cut spending without cutting all the special classes and extracurricular activities?" For starters, let's get rid of the school board or at the very least drastically reduce their control and, of course, pay. They have proven themselves to be less than brilliant when it comes to knowing what to cut, how to handle budgets, and anything and everything connected with schools and money. Their salaries will be a great addition to school budgets. But who will be in charge if the school board is dismissed? Here's an easy one--parents and teachers. Now there's an idea--having people who actually know what's going on being in charge. Let's change the previous school board mass into a larger PTA-like body. Since only interested, educated, and involved parents and teachers will participate, there should be no fear of careless voting on important decisions that will impact student learning.
Besides the change in power, there are simple in-school money saving options. There are the aforementioned styrofoam cups, but schools also waste a lot of money on paper. Too many copies are made because worksheets are overused. If the budget is really as tight as it is portrayed as being, why not get rid of the FCAT--if only for a while? My sister came up with that suggestion, and I agree with it wholeheartedly. Being as involved in schools as I have been, I know firsthand how the FCAT has the potential to squeeze its way into the curriculum and almost totally push out any chance of having fun and meaningful lessons that should be taught on a regular basis. It's not that the test doesn't have things on it that kids don't need to know, it's the approach that teachers are forced (yes, forced) to take to drill the information into the heads of the children, who are ready to burst by the time the test comes around. It creates an unnecessary burden on teachers and students. In addition, it doesn't allow for much leeway when it comes to teachers planning lessons. I could go on about the FCAT, but I digress and will return to my suggestions for money saving options.
Another option is to stop building new schools just on a whim. Of course, this urge could be quelled by getting rid of the build-happy school board members, but I'm including it on my list anyway. Trimming down the professional development requirements would also be a smart way to save money. Oftentimes, those professional development sessions feature old news--things that are taught in colleges and universities. I should know! As a recent graduate from the University of Central Florida (elementary education major) and professional development attendee, I can honestly say I learned very little to almost no new information at all whenever I went to local schools' professional development sessions. The information consisted of topics and suggestions that I had already heard in my college courses. Granted, there are older teachers who may be unfamiliar with some things, but a lot of the information is common sense! If it isn't, all those teachers have to do is ask a colleague for help.
Well, this long blog contains only a start to the possibilities that schools should reach for in an effort to achieve a setup that is based on more common sense, less money, and fewer high-falutin' school leaders. I'm sure I will get riled enough to continue this at a later time. ;) Thanks for reading! Come back soon.
Teaching Girls and Boys Separately -- Good or Bad?
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (0)
Read this, and then see if you agree with my take on things. Leave comments! :)
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/magazine/02sex3-t.html?_r=1&ei=5088&en=2c738e6056cb2eeb&ex=1362027600&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin
On one hand, it probably is a good idea because, yes, there are obvious differences between how they learn and express themselves--and many examples were given in the article (like light, temperature, and even use of crayon colors). However, if we continue to break it down and separate different students, we're eventually going to end up on an individualized system---where it's one teacher per one student. Since this obviously isn't practical nor possible (since we struggle to get one good teacher per 18-30 kids)---we have to accept that kids are going to have to be grouped together at some point and in some fashion. People used to (and some still do) complain about keeping children with certain disabilities out of the mainstream classrooms, so now, we're required to include them, and teachers have to create an IEP (Individualized Education Plan) for those students to make sure they're making progress according to their abilities.
The reality is, once the kids grow up, they're going to have to work in a coed environment--both at work and in their personals lives. Apparently, it is already hard enough for men and women to understand each other, so how would separating them at an early age really benefit them in the long run? I believe they should have coed classrooms, where the teacher recognizes the differences of each student--whether it means boy or girl, black or white, fast or slow, or whatever--and that teacher uses that knowledge of differences to create a positive learning experience for each child. Doing different things to cottle each child's needs should be done in an effort to individualize the education of every student in a mixed student environment.
Do I believe separating them is going to help both in the here-in-now and the future? No. Sure, there is a list of things that might benefit them slightly in the present (i.e., classroom lighting and temperature), but is that going to make a big enough impact on how they learn now without depriving them of normal social interaction and learning about each other and how to work with each other? I don't personally think so.
In reaction to the part that said the South has a more "conservative view" of gender roles...What we need to do, instead of separating the kids, is find teachers who know what they're doing and who don't promote or favor one gender over the other, or one culture over another, or whatever the case may be.
By separating boys from girls, I think the people are using those differences against the children. And if you have a teacher that believes radical thoughts one way or another about one gender and then shares those ideas through his/her teachings, the kids are not going to benefit from that. It's going to create a further divided society---actually, even if the teacher doesn't have radical teachings, it can create that sort of dynamic.
Nowadays, they tell us future teachers (like a million times a week) to use cooperative learning--where children of different abilities can work together and feed off of each other's strengths. I think this should apply to gender as well. If boys "can see action better" than girls, but the girls can see the "color and texture," then why not put them together to create the picture you want them to see as a whole?
To sell single-sex classrooms to parents by only providing the positives is not honest. How about giving them the positives and the negatives? Sax apparently has a problem with looking at research that disagrees with his views.
Anyway, the fact is, students are resilient and will conform to whatever is thrown their way--consider the one-room schoolhouses that used to exist. However, whatever they're being "thrown into" is not always the best way to go, of course. And in this case, single-sex classes are not the best way to go.
Ugh---I'm reading the article as I respond, and I just read the one part that says, "tidy science experiment: pouring red water, blue oil and clear syrup into a plastic cup to test which has the greatest density, then confirming their results with the firsthand knowledge that when you're doing the dishes after your mother makes fried chicken, the oil always settles on top of the water in the sink." What the heck? This is part of the problem!!! You are, as a teacher, supposed to use examples that bring aspects of the students' experiences into your teaching when it's applicable, but to say something gender specific like that is dumb. How about saying, "like when your mom or dad washes dishes after cooking"---not just the mom, Ward Cleaver (from "Leave It to Beaver")!!!
As for the success that has apparently been generated just by parents enrolling students in a single-sex class...how can we say it's not just the placebo effect? In other words, the parents, teachers, and/or students are led to believe the children's education system is better, so they play into that and benefit. It is said that when students--like those from a low socioeconomic status--get put in a new building with new things, they are more likely to treat it better than they would a run-down school. So, since this is a new teaching style, what's to say the students (and teachers) aren't reacting in a positive wayy just because it's a new system with new promises? And like the article states, those positive results were mostly seen where the higher-performing teachers and students were a big part of the active members in the single-sex classrooms. This goes back to the fact that the lower-performing teachers and students (especially the latter) are not often offered and/or exposed to things that are said to improve learning.
--What's with the inclusion of the 'dead rat in the wall' part? Ew.--
I totally agree with Giedd here--- "Giedd suggests the same is true when educators use gender alone to assign educational experiences for kids. Yes, you'll get more students who favor cooperative learning in the girls' room, and more students who enjoy competitive learning in the boys', but you won't do very well. Says Giedd, 'There are just too many exceptions to the rule.' " Definitely. What works for some children does not work for all, which is why teachers are told to engage all of the different kinds of learning styles and strengths in their lessons--for the benefit of each individual student.
A thought-provoking article--no? :)
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/magazine/02sex3-t.html?_r=1&ei=5088&en=2c738e6056cb2eeb&ex=1362027600&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin
On one hand, it probably is a good idea because, yes, there are obvious differences between how they learn and express themselves--and many examples were given in the article (like light, temperature, and even use of crayon colors). However, if we continue to break it down and separate different students, we're eventually going to end up on an individualized system---where it's one teacher per one student. Since this obviously isn't practical nor possible (since we struggle to get one good teacher per 18-30 kids)---we have to accept that kids are going to have to be grouped together at some point and in some fashion. People used to (and some still do) complain about keeping children with certain disabilities out of the mainstream classrooms, so now, we're required to include them, and teachers have to create an IEP (Individualized Education Plan) for those students to make sure they're making progress according to their abilities.
The reality is, once the kids grow up, they're going to have to work in a coed environment--both at work and in their personals lives. Apparently, it is already hard enough for men and women to understand each other, so how would separating them at an early age really benefit them in the long run? I believe they should have coed classrooms, where the teacher recognizes the differences of each student--whether it means boy or girl, black or white, fast or slow, or whatever--and that teacher uses that knowledge of differences to create a positive learning experience for each child. Doing different things to cottle each child's needs should be done in an effort to individualize the education of every student in a mixed student environment.
Do I believe separating them is going to help both in the here-in-now and the future? No. Sure, there is a list of things that might benefit them slightly in the present (i.e., classroom lighting and temperature), but is that going to make a big enough impact on how they learn now without depriving them of normal social interaction and learning about each other and how to work with each other? I don't personally think so.
In reaction to the part that said the South has a more "conservative view" of gender roles...What we need to do, instead of separating the kids, is find teachers who know what they're doing and who don't promote or favor one gender over the other, or one culture over another, or whatever the case may be.
By separating boys from girls, I think the people are using those differences against the children. And if you have a teacher that believes radical thoughts one way or another about one gender and then shares those ideas through his/her teachings, the kids are not going to benefit from that. It's going to create a further divided society---actually, even if the teacher doesn't have radical teachings, it can create that sort of dynamic.
Nowadays, they tell us future teachers (like a million times a week) to use cooperative learning--where children of different abilities can work together and feed off of each other's strengths. I think this should apply to gender as well. If boys "can see action better" than girls, but the girls can see the "color and texture," then why not put them together to create the picture you want them to see as a whole?
To sell single-sex classrooms to parents by only providing the positives is not honest. How about giving them the positives and the negatives? Sax apparently has a problem with looking at research that disagrees with his views.
Anyway, the fact is, students are resilient and will conform to whatever is thrown their way--consider the one-room schoolhouses that used to exist. However, whatever they're being "thrown into" is not always the best way to go, of course. And in this case, single-sex classes are not the best way to go.
Ugh---I'm reading the article as I respond, and I just read the one part that says, "tidy science experiment: pouring red water, blue oil and clear syrup into a plastic cup to test which has the greatest density, then confirming their results with the firsthand knowledge that when you're doing the dishes after your mother makes fried chicken, the oil always settles on top of the water in the sink." What the heck? This is part of the problem!!! You are, as a teacher, supposed to use examples that bring aspects of the students' experiences into your teaching when it's applicable, but to say something gender specific like that is dumb. How about saying, "like when your mom or dad washes dishes after cooking"---not just the mom, Ward Cleaver (from "Leave It to Beaver")!!!
As for the success that has apparently been generated just by parents enrolling students in a single-sex class...how can we say it's not just the placebo effect? In other words, the parents, teachers, and/or students are led to believe the children's education system is better, so they play into that and benefit. It is said that when students--like those from a low socioeconomic status--get put in a new building with new things, they are more likely to treat it better than they would a run-down school. So, since this is a new teaching style, what's to say the students (and teachers) aren't reacting in a positive wayy just because it's a new system with new promises? And like the article states, those positive results were mostly seen where the higher-performing teachers and students were a big part of the active members in the single-sex classrooms. This goes back to the fact that the lower-performing teachers and students (especially the latter) are not often offered and/or exposed to things that are said to improve learning.
--What's with the inclusion of the 'dead rat in the wall' part? Ew.--
I totally agree with Giedd here--- "Giedd suggests the same is true when educators use gender alone to assign educational experiences for kids. Yes, you'll get more students who favor cooperative learning in the girls' room, and more students who enjoy competitive learning in the boys', but you won't do very well. Says Giedd, 'There are just too many exceptions to the rule.' " Definitely. What works for some children does not work for all, which is why teachers are told to engage all of the different kinds of learning styles and strengths in their lessons--for the benefit of each individual student.
A thought-provoking article--no? :)
Work in Progress 4
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (1)
People take for granted today the many freedoms that did not exist in the past. Nowadays, different races can use the same facilities, enjoy the right to vote, be recognized as equals, and much more. And women have come a long way as well - with the ability to vote, seek a greater education, work toward career goals, etc. It is quite amazing once you really think about the advances that have been made in both aspects of inequality's past and present state.
When I hear of racism or gender inequality today, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people who hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary? It makes me wonder--what makes some people think violence and racism are acceptable in today's world? I realize that society's moral standards have gone down, but haven't we at least moved on in the department of race relations? I would venture to say that the majority of the country has moved on, so what went wrong in the minds of those people involved in the Jena 6 story and other similar cases of racial tension? It truly baffles me.
People who commit violence or unfairly treat other races should suffer equal consequences - no matter what their gender or race is. For the Jena 6 issue, I think both the white students who hung the nooses and the black students who beat the innocent white student should be punished to the fullest extent of the law - not only as a consequence for their actions, but also to serve as an example and a warning to other potential "thugs" in an effort to prevent such occurrences in the future. Violence like that which took place in the Jena 6 case should be punished severely. The black students had nothing but hate in their hearts as they kicked one helpless guy until he was out like a light. As for the white people who put up the nooses...they should be put in jail for a hate crime. What is wrong with these people? Seriously?!
Besides the instances dealing with racial tension, we still have gender issues today that we are trying to deal with. These days, men and women compete for the same careers and overall goals in life. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner. In the past, men grew up with the idea that it was their job to provide for the family. Today, I think there is a slight change in that kind of upbringing, but I hope that it will continue to change for a more 'woman-accepting' upbringing. It's important for young men to learn that women can contribute to a conversation, a relationship, or a business as well as any man.
There is still progress to be made as far as equality is concerned. As teachers, it is our duty to model and encourage equal treatment for men, women, and all races. We are teaching the future leaders and citizens of America, and if we expect to see equality progress, we have to promote it.
I ended up changing only one word this time, so I figured I bettter supplement my blog post once again with some more ramblings. :)
As I stated in my last post, this week I have internship for the whole week instead of just the regular Monday/Tuesday schedule. Today (Tuesday), my coordinator came for the last time to observe me teaching a lesson. I taught a guided reading lesson using a small book dealing with weather (so I was able to incorporate science standards). It went really well. I was happy to hear that I had improved on giving students more specific praise---which is one of the things I was trying to get better at. :)
I still can't believe my internship's almost over! I'm going to miss it a lot! :(
When I hear of racism or gender inequality today, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people who hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary? It makes me wonder--what makes some people think violence and racism are acceptable in today's world? I realize that society's moral standards have gone down, but haven't we at least moved on in the department of race relations? I would venture to say that the majority of the country has moved on, so what went wrong in the minds of those people involved in the Jena 6 story and other similar cases of racial tension? It truly baffles me.
People who commit violence or unfairly treat other races should suffer equal consequences - no matter what their gender or race is. For the Jena 6 issue, I think both the white students who hung the nooses and the black students who beat the innocent white student should be punished to the fullest extent of the law - not only as a consequence for their actions, but also to serve as an example and a warning to other potential "thugs" in an effort to prevent such occurrences in the future. Violence like that which took place in the Jena 6 case should be punished severely. The black students had nothing but hate in their hearts as they kicked one helpless guy until he was out like a light. As for the white people who put up the nooses...they should be put in jail for a hate crime. What is wrong with these people? Seriously?!
Besides the instances dealing with racial tension, we still have gender issues today that we are trying to deal with. These days, men and women compete for the same careers and overall goals in life. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner. In the past, men grew up with the idea that it was their job to provide for the family. Today, I think there is a slight change in that kind of upbringing, but I hope that it will continue to change for a more 'woman-accepting' upbringing. It's important for young men to learn that women can contribute to a conversation, a relationship, or a business as well as any man.
There is still progress to be made as far as equality is concerned. As teachers, it is our duty to model and encourage equal treatment for men, women, and all races. We are teaching the future leaders and citizens of America, and if we expect to see equality progress, we have to promote it.
I ended up changing only one word this time, so I figured I bettter supplement my blog post once again with some more ramblings. :)
As I stated in my last post, this week I have internship for the whole week instead of just the regular Monday/Tuesday schedule. Today (Tuesday), my coordinator came for the last time to observe me teaching a lesson. I taught a guided reading lesson using a small book dealing with weather (so I was able to incorporate science standards). It went really well. I was happy to hear that I had improved on giving students more specific praise---which is one of the things I was trying to get better at. :)
I still can't believe my internship's almost over! I'm going to miss it a lot! :(
Work in Progress 3
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (0)
People take for granted today the many freedoms that did not exist in the past. Nowadays, different races can use the same facilities, enjoy the right to vote, be recognized as equals, and much more. And women have come a long way as well - with the ability to vote, seek a greater education, work toward career goals, etc. It is quite amazing once you really think about the advances that have been made in both aspects of inequality's past and present state.
When I hear of racism or gender inequality today, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people that hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary? It makes me wonder--what makes some people think violence and racism are acceptable in today's world? I realize that society's moral standards have gone down, but haven't we at least moved on in the department of race relations? I would venture to say that the majority of the country has moved on, so what went wrong in the minds of those people involved in the Jena 6 story and other similar cases of racial tension? It truly baffles me.
People who commit violence or unfairly treat other races should suffer equal consequences - no matter what their gender or race is. For the Jena 6 issue, I think both the white students who hung the nooses and the black students who beat the innocent white student should be punished to the fullest extent of the law - not only as a consequence for their actions, but also to serve as an example and a warning to other potential "thugs" in an effort to prevent such occurrences in the future. Violence like that which took place in the Jena 6 case should be punished severely. The black students had nothing but hate in their hearts as they kicked one helpless guy until he was out like a light. As for the white people who put up the nooses...they should be put in jail for a hate crime. What is wrong with these people? Seriously?!
Besides the instances dealing with racial tension, we still have gender issues today that we are trying to deal with. These days, men and women compete for the same careers and overall goals in life. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner. In the past, men grew up with the idea that it was their job to provide for the family. Today, I think there is a slight change in that kind of upbringing, but I hope that it will continue to change for a more 'woman-accepting' upbringing. It's important for young men to learn that women can contribute to a conversation, a relationship, or a business as well as any man.
There is still progress to be made as far as equality is concerned. As teachers, it is our duty to model and encourage equal treatment for men, women, and all races. We are teaching the future leaders and citizens of America, and if we expect to see equality progress, we have to promote it.
Since I didn't have too many changes (except for the last paragraph) that I wanted to make to my blog project right now, I'll share a little bit about my internship. It's almost over! I can't believe it! Next week, I go for the entire week, and then after that, it will be Thanksgiving break. I'll only have the Monday and Tuesday following the break, and then my first internship will be done. It has been a great experience --- I can't stress that enough. I have learned so much and seen and experienced firsthand the things about being a teacher that they don't teach you in college.
Yesterday (Monday), I went on a field trip to Rollins College with the first graders. And wouldn't you know it --- I forgot my camera!!! So, unfortunately, I can't show you pictures of my class. :( They enjoyed the trip though. Oh--and one thing I learned today and wanted to share is that first graders don't know how to use a paper clip. :) I guess I never really thought about the fact that that is a learned skill. :-P :) Have a great week, and I'll see Christie and Olyvia on Thursday! :)
When I hear of racism or gender inequality today, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people that hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary? It makes me wonder--what makes some people think violence and racism are acceptable in today's world? I realize that society's moral standards have gone down, but haven't we at least moved on in the department of race relations? I would venture to say that the majority of the country has moved on, so what went wrong in the minds of those people involved in the Jena 6 story and other similar cases of racial tension? It truly baffles me.
People who commit violence or unfairly treat other races should suffer equal consequences - no matter what their gender or race is. For the Jena 6 issue, I think both the white students who hung the nooses and the black students who beat the innocent white student should be punished to the fullest extent of the law - not only as a consequence for their actions, but also to serve as an example and a warning to other potential "thugs" in an effort to prevent such occurrences in the future. Violence like that which took place in the Jena 6 case should be punished severely. The black students had nothing but hate in their hearts as they kicked one helpless guy until he was out like a light. As for the white people who put up the nooses...they should be put in jail for a hate crime. What is wrong with these people? Seriously?!
Besides the instances dealing with racial tension, we still have gender issues today that we are trying to deal with. These days, men and women compete for the same careers and overall goals in life. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner. In the past, men grew up with the idea that it was their job to provide for the family. Today, I think there is a slight change in that kind of upbringing, but I hope that it will continue to change for a more 'woman-accepting' upbringing. It's important for young men to learn that women can contribute to a conversation, a relationship, or a business as well as any man.
There is still progress to be made as far as equality is concerned. As teachers, it is our duty to model and encourage equal treatment for men, women, and all races. We are teaching the future leaders and citizens of America, and if we expect to see equality progress, we have to promote it.
Since I didn't have too many changes (except for the last paragraph) that I wanted to make to my blog project right now, I'll share a little bit about my internship. It's almost over! I can't believe it! Next week, I go for the entire week, and then after that, it will be Thanksgiving break. I'll only have the Monday and Tuesday following the break, and then my first internship will be done. It has been a great experience --- I can't stress that enough. I have learned so much and seen and experienced firsthand the things about being a teacher that they don't teach you in college.
Yesterday (Monday), I went on a field trip to Rollins College with the first graders. And wouldn't you know it --- I forgot my camera!!! So, unfortunately, I can't show you pictures of my class. :( They enjoyed the trip though. Oh--and one thing I learned today and wanted to share is that first graders don't know how to use a paper clip. :) I guess I never really thought about the fact that that is a learned skill. :-P :) Have a great week, and I'll see Christie and Olyvia on Thursday! :)
Work in Progress 2
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (0)
People take for granted today the many freedoms that did not exist in the past. Nowadays, different races can use the same facilities, enjoy the right to vote, be recognized as equals, and much more. And women have come a long way as well - with the ability to vote, seek a greater education, work toward career goals, etc. It is quite amazing once you really think about the advances that have been made in both aspects of inequality's past and present state.
When I hear of racism or gender inequality today, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people that hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary? It makes me wonder--what makes some people think violence and racism are acceptable in today's world? I realize that society's moral standards have gone down, but haven't we at least moved on in the department of race relations? I would venture to say that the majority of the country has moved on, so what went wrong in the minds of those people involved in the Jena 6 story and other similar cases of racial tension? It truly baffles me.
People who commit violence or unfairly treat other races should suffer equal consequences - no matter what their gender or race is. For the Jena 6 issue, I think both the white students who hung the nooses and the black students who beat the innocent white student should be punished to the fullest extent of the law - not only as a consequence for their actions, but also to serve as an example and a warning to other potential "thugs" in an effort to prevent such occurrences in the future. Violence like that which took place in the Jena 6 case should be punished severely. The black students had nothing but hate in their hearts as they kicked one helpless guy until he was out like a light. As for the white people who put up the nooses...they should be put in jail for a hate crime. What is wrong with these people? Seriously?!
Besides the instances dealing with racial tension, we still have gender issues today that we are trying to deal with. These days, men and women compete for the same careers and overall goals in life. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner. In the past, men grew up with the idea that it was their job to provide for the family. Today, I think there is a slight change in that kind of upbringing, but I hope that it will continue to change for a more 'woman-accepting' upbringing. It's important for young men to learn that women can contribute to a conversation, a relationship, or a business as well as any man.
Even in 2007, we still have a bit to go with the progress of an equal man/woman and race society.
When I hear of racism or gender inequality today, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people that hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary? It makes me wonder--what makes some people think violence and racism are acceptable in today's world? I realize that society's moral standards have gone down, but haven't we at least moved on in the department of race relations? I would venture to say that the majority of the country has moved on, so what went wrong in the minds of those people involved in the Jena 6 story and other similar cases of racial tension? It truly baffles me.
People who commit violence or unfairly treat other races should suffer equal consequences - no matter what their gender or race is. For the Jena 6 issue, I think both the white students who hung the nooses and the black students who beat the innocent white student should be punished to the fullest extent of the law - not only as a consequence for their actions, but also to serve as an example and a warning to other potential "thugs" in an effort to prevent such occurrences in the future. Violence like that which took place in the Jena 6 case should be punished severely. The black students had nothing but hate in their hearts as they kicked one helpless guy until he was out like a light. As for the white people who put up the nooses...they should be put in jail for a hate crime. What is wrong with these people? Seriously?!
Besides the instances dealing with racial tension, we still have gender issues today that we are trying to deal with. These days, men and women compete for the same careers and overall goals in life. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner. In the past, men grew up with the idea that it was their job to provide for the family. Today, I think there is a slight change in that kind of upbringing, but I hope that it will continue to change for a more 'woman-accepting' upbringing. It's important for young men to learn that women can contribute to a conversation, a relationship, or a business as well as any man.
Even in 2007, we still have a bit to go with the progress of an equal man/woman and race society.
Work in Progress 1
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (0)
Revision of draft:
I have decided to cut and paste a few parts from my previous blogs into this, so if some of it looks familiar, you're not crazy, I'm just using it again. :)
People take for granted today the many freedoms that did not exist in the past. Nowadays, different races can use the same facilities, enjoy the right to vote, be recognized as equals, and much more. And women have come a long way as well - with the ability to vote, seek a greater education, work toward career goals, etc. It is quite amazing once you really think about the advances that have been made.
When I hear of racism or gender inequality, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people that hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary? It makes me wonder--what makes some people think violence and racism are acceptable in today's world? I realize that society's moral standards have gone down, but haven't we at least moved on the department of race relations? I would venture to say that the majority of the country has moved on, so what went wrong in the minds of those people involved in the Jena 6 story and other similar cases of racial tension?
People who commit violence or unfairly treat other races should suffer equal consequences. For the Jena 6 issue, I think both the white students who hung the nooses and the black students who beat the innocent white student should be punished. Violence like that which has occurred in that case should be punished severely. The black students had nothing but hate in their hearts as they kicked one helpless guy until he was out like a light. As for the white people who put up the nooses should be put in jail for a hate crime. What is wrong with these people? Seriously?!
Besides the instances dealing with racial tension, we still have gender issues today that we are trying to deal with. These days, men and women compete for the same careers. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner. (Christie pointed out a couple of things for this part of my writing, so I'm going to try to address her comment.) In the past, men grew up with the idea that it was their job to provide for the family. Today, I see a slight change in that kind of upbringing, but I hope that it will continue to change for a more 'woman-accepting' upbringing. It's important for young men to learn that women can contribute to a conversation, a relationship, or a business as well as any man.
"That's all folks!"--for now anyway... :)
I have decided to cut and paste a few parts from my previous blogs into this, so if some of it looks familiar, you're not crazy, I'm just using it again. :)
People take for granted today the many freedoms that did not exist in the past. Nowadays, different races can use the same facilities, enjoy the right to vote, be recognized as equals, and much more. And women have come a long way as well - with the ability to vote, seek a greater education, work toward career goals, etc. It is quite amazing once you really think about the advances that have been made.
When I hear of racism or gender inequality, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people that hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary? It makes me wonder--what makes some people think violence and racism are acceptable in today's world? I realize that society's moral standards have gone down, but haven't we at least moved on the department of race relations? I would venture to say that the majority of the country has moved on, so what went wrong in the minds of those people involved in the Jena 6 story and other similar cases of racial tension?
People who commit violence or unfairly treat other races should suffer equal consequences. For the Jena 6 issue, I think both the white students who hung the nooses and the black students who beat the innocent white student should be punished. Violence like that which has occurred in that case should be punished severely. The black students had nothing but hate in their hearts as they kicked one helpless guy until he was out like a light. As for the white people who put up the nooses should be put in jail for a hate crime. What is wrong with these people? Seriously?!
Besides the instances dealing with racial tension, we still have gender issues today that we are trying to deal with. These days, men and women compete for the same careers. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner. (Christie pointed out a couple of things for this part of my writing, so I'm going to try to address her comment.) In the past, men grew up with the idea that it was their job to provide for the family. Today, I see a slight change in that kind of upbringing, but I hope that it will continue to change for a more 'woman-accepting' upbringing. It's important for young men to learn that women can contribute to a conversation, a relationship, or a business as well as any man.
"That's all folks!"--for now anyway... :)
Happy Halloween!
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (1)
Well, Halloween is over now because it's 1:30 on Thursday morning, but HAPPY HALLOWEEN anyway! Hehehe Wow...it's soooo late, and I don't really have anything to blog about right now. Hmmm... I suppose I'll do a Halloween poem. Again--I'm not really a poem person, but I resort to it on here when I'm at a loss for words. :-P :)
There was an old witch who flew at night,
And she happened to have bad eyesight.
She'd barely miss running into stuff,
So soon she decided she'd had enough.
She put down her broom - she thought for good,
But decided she'd fix her eyes if she could.
She stirred up a brew with hopes it would work.
When she drank the concoction, her ears perked.
But her eyes were no better, she still could not see,
So she tried one more time - adding mud to her tea.
Once she drank it, she could see all around.
Only problem was now, she couldn't hear a sound.
Oh, my....That was cheesy, random, weird, and appropriately scary for this holiday. :-/ Oh well. Happy Halloween! :)
There was an old witch who flew at night,
And she happened to have bad eyesight.
She'd barely miss running into stuff,
So soon she decided she'd had enough.
She put down her broom - she thought for good,
But decided she'd fix her eyes if she could.
She stirred up a brew with hopes it would work.
When she drank the concoction, her ears perked.
But her eyes were no better, she still could not see,
So she tried one more time - adding mud to her tea.
Once she drank it, she could see all around.
Only problem was now, she couldn't hear a sound.
Oh, my....That was cheesy, random, weird, and appropriately scary for this holiday. :-/ Oh well. Happy Halloween! :)
Working Toward the Final Product for Blog Assignment - Inequality
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (2)
Yes, Olyivia, I will use red pen to grade things once in a while. I will use other colors too though just to avoid monotony. :)
Well, here is the start of my final product for my blog. I have chosen to combine several of my blog topics into one umbrella topic - inequality (with a focus on gender & race). It is almost a cliche issue because many people choose it as a topic to write about, but I think it's an important issue that should be discussed and confronted.
I have blogged about many things that are seemingly random (and many of them are :)), but I plan to use some or all of the following past blog topics: the Jena 6, the adverse effect of the hip-hop culture on youth, money & gender, inappropriate ads (I'm sure I can use that one somehow), high expectations, and maybe a couple of others that I might be able to associate with the topic. I'll see how it pans out near the end. This is one of my first drafts, so it's only going to be the tip of the iceberg. Bear with me. :)
People take for granted today the many freedoms that did not exist in the past. Nowadays, different races can use the same facilities, enjoy the right to vote, be recognized as equals, and much more. And women have come a long way as well - with the ability to vote, seek a greater education, work towards career goals, etc. It is quite amazing once you really think about the advances that have been made.
When I hear of racism or gender inequality, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people that hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary?
Besides the cases of racial tension, we still have gender issues. These days, men and women compete for the same careers. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner.
---I'm going to stop here because my 20 minutes are up, it's late, and I have to go to bed. So, I will continue with this at a later time. Have a good week, fellow bloggers and blog-readers! :-D
Well, here is the start of my final product for my blog. I have chosen to combine several of my blog topics into one umbrella topic - inequality (with a focus on gender & race). It is almost a cliche issue because many people choose it as a topic to write about, but I think it's an important issue that should be discussed and confronted.
I have blogged about many things that are seemingly random (and many of them are :)), but I plan to use some or all of the following past blog topics: the Jena 6, the adverse effect of the hip-hop culture on youth, money & gender, inappropriate ads (I'm sure I can use that one somehow), high expectations, and maybe a couple of others that I might be able to associate with the topic. I'll see how it pans out near the end. This is one of my first drafts, so it's only going to be the tip of the iceberg. Bear with me. :)
People take for granted today the many freedoms that did not exist in the past. Nowadays, different races can use the same facilities, enjoy the right to vote, be recognized as equals, and much more. And women have come a long way as well - with the ability to vote, seek a greater education, work towards career goals, etc. It is quite amazing once you really think about the advances that have been made.
When I hear of racism or gender inequality, however, I wonder why the individuals involved are still stuck in the dark ages. Stories like the Jena 6 make me sick. Did those white people that hung the nooses in the tree really grow up in the same country and same decade as me? And did the black students who beat the white student (who wasn't even involved in the noose-hanging incident) even think about the consequences of their actions, or did they just act on animal instinct like they see in video games and media, thinking that violence is normal, acceptable, and necessary?
Besides the cases of racial tension, we still have gender issues. These days, men and women compete for the same careers. So why would a man be offended if a woman makes more than he does or visa versa? It's not because it's only one gender's role to win the bread for the family, it's because both men and women are competitive. We both feel the need to win--whether we're striving for the best job, the highest paycheck, or even trying to be the one who pays for a nice dinner.
---I'm going to stop here because my 20 minutes are up, it's late, and I have to go to bed. So, I will continue with this at a later time. Have a good week, fellow bloggers and blog-readers! :-D
The Use of Red Pens Leads to Low Self Esteem?
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (2)
I've heard that teachers are no longer allowed to grade students' papers using red pen because it lowers their self esteem. I'd like to know what 'psychologist' came up with that. These days, it seems like we are trying to make everyone happy all of the time, but we are forgetting the common phrase--"You can make some of the people happy some of the time, but you can't make all of the people happy all of the time"---(or something to that effect.) :)
I would think that no matter what color you use to grade a student's paper, if he got an "F," he's not going to be happy whether it's written in purple or aqua-marine. Instead of focusing on the color of pen we're using, the student needs to look at the grade and use it to see if he's learning the concepts or not. And we as teachers need to focus on the students' needs as far as giving them a good education is concerned.
No one likes a bad grade, and another color is not going to make it look more appealing. The color red is not going to ruin a child's self esteem in my opinion. Generations of people have lived through their teachers' usage of red pens, and they're just fine. Grading is a way to show what a student has/hasn't learned, his progress over time, and it also helps in self evaluation of success. Therefore, it's important to point out to children that the grade is a helpful evaluation tool for them and for teachers and the education system as a whole--it's not to torture them.
Red ink is our friend! :)
I would think that no matter what color you use to grade a student's paper, if he got an "F," he's not going to be happy whether it's written in purple or aqua-marine. Instead of focusing on the color of pen we're using, the student needs to look at the grade and use it to see if he's learning the concepts or not. And we as teachers need to focus on the students' needs as far as giving them a good education is concerned.
No one likes a bad grade, and another color is not going to make it look more appealing. The color red is not going to ruin a child's self esteem in my opinion. Generations of people have lived through their teachers' usage of red pens, and they're just fine. Grading is a way to show what a student has/hasn't learned, his progress over time, and it also helps in self evaluation of success. Therefore, it's important to point out to children that the grade is a helpful evaluation tool for them and for teachers and the education system as a whole--it's not to torture them.
Red ink is our friend! :)
High Expectations
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (1)
Before I begin with tonight's topic of "High Expectations," I'd like to respond to Christie's last response to my "Birth Control for Eleven Year Olds" blog. Wow, Christie, that is depressing that you've had to deal with the issue already in the high school where you work. You gave a good response to the girl. If I were in your place, I don't know what I would have said! I don't know what's wrong with people these days. Children don't need birth control--they need good parents! Now for tonight's topic...
Recently, I was forwarded a link to yet another website that conjures up some random, blog-worthy thoughts in my head. Here's the link... http://www.bju.edu/prospective/expect/dress.html The site is just a list of dress code expectations for the students at Bob Jones University (wherever that is--never heard of it.) After looking over the expectations, all I could really say was WOW. Their rules are so strict it's ridiculous.
I'm a Christian girl, but I'm sorry--wearing flip-flops is not a sin. I believe students SHOULD be required to wear appropriate, conservative dress in schools (and everywhere), but they should also be allowed to have more say in what the wear. "Morning Dress–dress shirt (no denim/chambray) with tie, dress or neat casual pants (no jeans, cargo, carpenter, or sloppy pants), dress or leather casual shoes; sweaters should show shirt collar and tie knot (no sweatshirts)." Aren't they getting a bit picky with the shirt collar sticking out just so, the no-jeans rule, etc.? Their rules are over the top in my opinion.
At Fern Creek (where I'm interning), they require the older students to tuck in their shirts so that they are presentable, and skirts must come to a certain length. Rules like these make sense to me because they allow children to choose what they wear but also make sure that they are wearing things properly and presenting themselves properly to others. It is good to set rules and expectations for students because they know what is required of them, but in the case of dress, it would make more sense to set some basic rules (like the examples from Fern Creek), and then if a few problems arise, deal with them on an individual basis.
Although I do believe in individuality---in some cases, I would opt for uniforms--but only in extreme cases. For instance, if a school has mostly low-income students who can't afford clothing, it would be beneficial to have them wear uniforms. Also, if there is a school in the inner city, where gang symbolism and inappropriate dress abound, then students should wear uniforms. Otherwise, give students the ability to make good choices about their dress.
Conservative clothing doesn't have to be 'un-trendy.' And I don't consider it a sin to have well-fitted clothes instead of "loose fitting shirts and pants." Students should be expected to wear conservative clothing, have 'normal' hair, and be free of distractions (like tongue piercings, green mohawks, and tattoos)--but they should be allowed to wear things found in an everyday department store--as long as it's appropriate.
Recently, I was forwarded a link to yet another website that conjures up some random, blog-worthy thoughts in my head. Here's the link... http://www.bju.edu/prospective/expect/dress.html The site is just a list of dress code expectations for the students at Bob Jones University (wherever that is--never heard of it.) After looking over the expectations, all I could really say was WOW. Their rules are so strict it's ridiculous.
I'm a Christian girl, but I'm sorry--wearing flip-flops is not a sin. I believe students SHOULD be required to wear appropriate, conservative dress in schools (and everywhere), but they should also be allowed to have more say in what the wear. "Morning Dress–dress shirt (no denim/chambray) with tie, dress or neat casual pants (no jeans, cargo, carpenter, or sloppy pants), dress or leather casual shoes; sweaters should show shirt collar and tie knot (no sweatshirts)." Aren't they getting a bit picky with the shirt collar sticking out just so, the no-jeans rule, etc.? Their rules are over the top in my opinion.
At Fern Creek (where I'm interning), they require the older students to tuck in their shirts so that they are presentable, and skirts must come to a certain length. Rules like these make sense to me because they allow children to choose what they wear but also make sure that they are wearing things properly and presenting themselves properly to others. It is good to set rules and expectations for students because they know what is required of them, but in the case of dress, it would make more sense to set some basic rules (like the examples from Fern Creek), and then if a few problems arise, deal with them on an individual basis.
Although I do believe in individuality---in some cases, I would opt for uniforms--but only in extreme cases. For instance, if a school has mostly low-income students who can't afford clothing, it would be beneficial to have them wear uniforms. Also, if there is a school in the inner city, where gang symbolism and inappropriate dress abound, then students should wear uniforms. Otherwise, give students the ability to make good choices about their dress.
Conservative clothing doesn't have to be 'un-trendy.' And I don't consider it a sin to have well-fitted clothes instead of "loose fitting shirts and pants." Students should be expected to wear conservative clothing, have 'normal' hair, and be free of distractions (like tongue piercings, green mohawks, and tattoos)--but they should be allowed to wear things found in an everyday department store--as long as it's appropriate.
My Siblings
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (1)
Well, I'm borrowing a blog idea from one of you again---this time it's from Olyvia. She wrote a nice blog about her sisters, so I thought I'd share a bit about my two sisters and brother.
First of all, I have to say, I find it so strange when people don't like their siblings. I can't imagine my life without my siblings! I actually have three older half brothers and one older half sister, but to keep it simple and uncomplicated, I'm going to stick with talking about the siblings with whom I share my Mom and my Dad. (My Dad was married and divorced before he married my Mom, so that's the background info.) :)
I have an older sister Jill, a younger sister Brittany, and the baby in the group is my brother Gregory (Greg). So, I am a middle child...kinda--since I share that spot with Brittany. We are each about three years apart--Greg is about three & a half years younger than Brittany. So now that I have you thoroughly confused and bored, I will move on to what makes them special to me. :)
Jill, being the oldest of the four, has always been the protector and 'mother hen' if you will of all of us younger kids. She and I have fond memories of playing travel agent, beach party, restaurant, and so much more as children. She is one of my best friends ever. She has always been there for me--encouraged me, laughed with me, occasionally laughed at me, and helped me with all sorts of things. Even though we're three years apart, we are so close that we say that we are twins but that one of us was born a year and a half early and the other a year and a half late. I have always looked up to the great example she provides. We have a great relationship--one that I deeply cherish. She is currently getting her Masters at Georgetown University, and so she lives and works in D.C. It's hard having her live so far away. Her visits home are few in number and don't come often enough, but we keep in touch by phone, email, and instant messaging.
Then, there's Brittany. Brittany Brittany Brittany. She is quite a character. :) She is a lot of fun to be around; she comes up with the strangest things to say sometimes--we just have to laugh. It's hard not to smile when she's around. When we were kids, I used to force her to play school with me. I complained often to my parents because she didn't want to sit still and listen. :) She is a very friendly, accepting, 'bubbly' person, and she cheers me up when I'm down or bored or what-have-you. She is my best friend too. (I don't have just one best friend because they're all the best.) She is always there for me also, and I wish she were here right now making me laugh as I blog. She recently left for her first year at the University of Florida, so I'm the only girl (besides my Mom) at the house now, but she gets to visit pretty often, since she's so close---so that's a good thing. :)
With Jill and Brittany gone, I'm left with Greg. :) He's great too. He's my big little brother. :) I remember when he came home for the first time as a cute little baby---now he's taller than me! He's only 14, but because he's so tall, people often think he's my boyfriend. I'm like, nooooo, people--he's my brother! :) Anyway, he is a very talented musician. He's in both the marching band and jazz band at school, and I get 'jazzed up' about his performances. (Pardon the pun.) ;) But it is so cool to see what he can do with the guitar especially (he plays trumpet and piano too). It blows me away. Besides being talented (as all my siblings are with different things), Greg is just a good guy. He is a caring, loyal, trustworthy best friend. I know that I can count on him for his support, and I value his opinions. He's the best little brother.
So, that's all I can really squeeze into 20 plus minutes of blogging about my siblings. I am WAY over the time limit right now. Oops! Really, I could spend weeks talking about them, but I have other homework to do. :) The moral of the story (that is my life) is that I love my siblings!!! :-D They are the best, and they are irreplaceable to me. I would NEVER trade them for anyone else and would NEVER want to be an only child. My siblings provided me with 'built in' best friends, entertainment, love, and support. God blessed me with three wonderful siblings, and for that I am very grateful.
First of all, I have to say, I find it so strange when people don't like their siblings. I can't imagine my life without my siblings! I actually have three older half brothers and one older half sister, but to keep it simple and uncomplicated, I'm going to stick with talking about the siblings with whom I share my Mom and my Dad. (My Dad was married and divorced before he married my Mom, so that's the background info.) :)
I have an older sister Jill, a younger sister Brittany, and the baby in the group is my brother Gregory (Greg). So, I am a middle child...kinda--since I share that spot with Brittany. We are each about three years apart--Greg is about three & a half years younger than Brittany. So now that I have you thoroughly confused and bored, I will move on to what makes them special to me. :)
Jill, being the oldest of the four, has always been the protector and 'mother hen' if you will of all of us younger kids. She and I have fond memories of playing travel agent, beach party, restaurant, and so much more as children. She is one of my best friends ever. She has always been there for me--encouraged me, laughed with me, occasionally laughed at me, and helped me with all sorts of things. Even though we're three years apart, we are so close that we say that we are twins but that one of us was born a year and a half early and the other a year and a half late. I have always looked up to the great example she provides. We have a great relationship--one that I deeply cherish. She is currently getting her Masters at Georgetown University, and so she lives and works in D.C. It's hard having her live so far away. Her visits home are few in number and don't come often enough, but we keep in touch by phone, email, and instant messaging.
Then, there's Brittany. Brittany Brittany Brittany. She is quite a character. :) She is a lot of fun to be around; she comes up with the strangest things to say sometimes--we just have to laugh. It's hard not to smile when she's around. When we were kids, I used to force her to play school with me. I complained often to my parents because she didn't want to sit still and listen. :) She is a very friendly, accepting, 'bubbly' person, and she cheers me up when I'm down or bored or what-have-you. She is my best friend too. (I don't have just one best friend because they're all the best.) She is always there for me also, and I wish she were here right now making me laugh as I blog. She recently left for her first year at the University of Florida, so I'm the only girl (besides my Mom) at the house now, but she gets to visit pretty often, since she's so close---so that's a good thing. :)
With Jill and Brittany gone, I'm left with Greg. :) He's great too. He's my big little brother. :) I remember when he came home for the first time as a cute little baby---now he's taller than me! He's only 14, but because he's so tall, people often think he's my boyfriend. I'm like, nooooo, people--he's my brother! :) Anyway, he is a very talented musician. He's in both the marching band and jazz band at school, and I get 'jazzed up' about his performances. (Pardon the pun.) ;) But it is so cool to see what he can do with the guitar especially (he plays trumpet and piano too). It blows me away. Besides being talented (as all my siblings are with different things), Greg is just a good guy. He is a caring, loyal, trustworthy best friend. I know that I can count on him for his support, and I value his opinions. He's the best little brother.
So, that's all I can really squeeze into 20 plus minutes of blogging about my siblings. I am WAY over the time limit right now. Oops! Really, I could spend weeks talking about them, but I have other homework to do. :) The moral of the story (that is my life) is that I love my siblings!!! :-D They are the best, and they are irreplaceable to me. I would NEVER trade them for anyone else and would NEVER want to be an only child. My siblings provided me with 'built in' best friends, entertainment, love, and support. God blessed me with three wonderful siblings, and for that I am very grateful.
Birth Control for Eleven Year Olds?
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (2)
I read an article about a middle school offering birth control to its female students. When I read the title of the article, I was like...you've GOT to be kidding me. But it was no lie--a school in Maine is actually going to do that. Here's the link: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/18/us/18portland.html?ex=1350360000&en=7fb352244936243a&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
First of all, whose idea was that? I know that society's morals have plummeted to extremely low standard as a whole, but do we really have sexually-active eleven year olds? I don't believe we do! So, we don't need to be giving contraceptives to middle schoolers. Can't they keep their innocence a bit longer? A school providing birth control is not only inappropriate for the age group, but it's also not the job of the school to hand out such things.
I was offended when, at the University of Central Florida's orientation, they took us incoming freshmen to a room, and said, "Here are a whole bunch of free condoms. Have at them." Not only was I disgusted, but I was angry because---were we supposed to be going to college to engage in immoral acts with people we're not married to or to get an education? I don't know about you, but I'm sick of being lectured on 'safe' things to do---JUST DON'T DO IT, PEOPLE, and quit talking to me about it!
I think people have lost focus. School is for teaching and LEARNING--it's not a place where we offer contraceptives to young people who shouldn't be involved in such a lifestyle.
First of all, whose idea was that? I know that society's morals have plummeted to extremely low standard as a whole, but do we really have sexually-active eleven year olds? I don't believe we do! So, we don't need to be giving contraceptives to middle schoolers. Can't they keep their innocence a bit longer? A school providing birth control is not only inappropriate for the age group, but it's also not the job of the school to hand out such things.
I was offended when, at the University of Central Florida's orientation, they took us incoming freshmen to a room, and said, "Here are a whole bunch of free condoms. Have at them." Not only was I disgusted, but I was angry because---were we supposed to be going to college to engage in immoral acts with people we're not married to or to get an education? I don't know about you, but I'm sick of being lectured on 'safe' things to do---JUST DON'T DO IT, PEOPLE, and quit talking to me about it!
I think people have lost focus. School is for teaching and LEARNING--it's not a place where we offer contraceptives to young people who shouldn't be involved in such a lifestyle.
First Grade
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (1)
Well, today marked my second day (on the 16th day of the tenth month) in my second placement in the first grade class. Hehe--how do you like all those ordinal numbers? :) Already, in working with the first grade class, I have found it to be quite--um--different (?) slash challenging (?) compared to fifth grade. OF COURSE, I expected it to be different, but I guess I somehow figured first graders would have good behavior mostly--just because they are sometimes known for just wanting to please the teacher and follow directions. In my internship, though, it was the fifth grade class that was good, and the first graders who are having a bit of difficulty with behavior. Right now, I'm thinking that teaching grades two through five is more for me. (I've worked with second and third graders in the past, so I know what they're like.) I'm leaning toward the upper grades though--third through fifth.
Don't get me wrong---the first graders are very cute, and some of the things they say are just amazing for their age, but with the lack of self-control, the baby-like needs, etc. ---it is not the ideal age group for me. I realize, however, that a lot of that depends on the teacher's discipline and classroom management, but it also depends on the individual child's maturity level at such a young age. Also, it seems to me that with the upper grades, since the kids are more mature and know more, there is an opportunity for more in-depth activities and higher expectations behavior-wise.
I am enjoying my time with the first graders--even though I am seeing and experiencing quite a few behavior issues. Ijust have come to the realization that I wouldn't want to teach them full-time for an entire school year. A few of the students are quite a handful! :) I'm not sure about my supervising teacher's methods of discipline yet....It seems like she's constantly correcting the kids, which takes time away from the others who are behaving well, but I'll see as time goes on what the real core of the problem is. My supervising teacher (Mrs. Preshong) said that the two days I've seen them have been bad days for the students and that they normally aren't acting like they did when I saw them, so I hope they'll be better next week when I come. It could be that they were just acting out for attention, since I was a new guest in the classroom. Who knows? Only time will tell.
Mrs. Preshong is very nice, and I am enjoying working with her. She is not as organized as Mrs. Abel (my first placement supervising teacher) is, so that's a bit different. But I think she is a good teacher overall, and she cares a great deal about her students, and that shows.
I look forward to learning more from this experience--even though I now know that teaching first grade full-time is not my cup of tea for the future.
Don't get me wrong---the first graders are very cute, and some of the things they say are just amazing for their age, but with the lack of self-control, the baby-like needs, etc. ---it is not the ideal age group for me. I realize, however, that a lot of that depends on the teacher's discipline and classroom management, but it also depends on the individual child's maturity level at such a young age. Also, it seems to me that with the upper grades, since the kids are more mature and know more, there is an opportunity for more in-depth activities and higher expectations behavior-wise.
I am enjoying my time with the first graders--even though I am seeing and experiencing quite a few behavior issues. Ijust have come to the realization that I wouldn't want to teach them full-time for an entire school year. A few of the students are quite a handful! :) I'm not sure about my supervising teacher's methods of discipline yet....It seems like she's constantly correcting the kids, which takes time away from the others who are behaving well, but I'll see as time goes on what the real core of the problem is. My supervising teacher (Mrs. Preshong) said that the two days I've seen them have been bad days for the students and that they normally aren't acting like they did when I saw them, so I hope they'll be better next week when I come. It could be that they were just acting out for attention, since I was a new guest in the classroom. Who knows? Only time will tell.
Mrs. Preshong is very nice, and I am enjoying working with her. She is not as organized as Mrs. Abel (my first placement supervising teacher) is, so that's a bit different. But I think she is a good teacher overall, and she cares a great deal about her students, and that shows.
I look forward to learning more from this experience--even though I now know that teaching first grade full-time is not my cup of tea for the future.
What are you going to name him?
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (1)
Before I begin with tonight's featured topic, I have to respond to Krystina and Olyvia's recent comments/questions left on my a couple of my recent blogs...
Krystina, you gave a very kind response to my last poem post. You really are toooo polite! I thought it was terrible, but I'm glad you enjoyed it. hehe :)
Olyvia, you asked if there is anything else I do in my church besides sing in the choir. Yes, I am the "webmaster" and web designer for the church website. (Check it out if you wish--http://www.geocities.com/fumcpinehills.) I am the 'youth minister' even though, right now, we don't have a youth group, and I am the Sunday school teacher for the youth also. And during the summer, I teach a class at Vacation Bible School, and I'm kind of their official decorator for the event too, which is always fun. I'm also on the Leadership Committee and a couple of other committees. I think that pretty much covers it! :)
You also asked what grade I would like to teach and at what school, and for the grade part of that question (which everyone asks), I usually just say third grade because I like all of the grades, but 3rd is in the middle, so I just stick with that answer. I just started in my second placement for internship in a first grade class today (Monday, October 15). Already, I'm thinking I might change my tune and stick with the upper grades, but I'll explain that later in an upcoming blog. As for the school I'd like to teach in, I would like to go back to the school I attended - Ridgewood Park Elementary--which is a very troubled school to say the least. I also like Fern Creek, though, which is where I'm interning right now because, even though the students there have issues, the school is great and holds high expectations. But we'll see where God places me to teach.
Okay--even though my responses themselves took up a good chunk of my 20 minute blog requirement, I will now move on to the subject of the night... :-P
"What are you going to name him?" a friend asks a couple expecting a child.
"We were considering these," the pregnant woman exclaims, pointing to the names "Tylar" and "Taiylor" on the list of baby names the couple had compiled.
Well, according to an article (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/08/international/europe/08names.html?pagewanted=1&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Subjects/B/Babies&_r=3&oref=slogin) I recently read, Denmark might refuse to allow the parents to name their child either one of those names without written permission from a government review board because they are not typical names and definitely aren't typical spellings. I was kind of surprised when I read this article. Here in America, we can name babies whatever we want -- whether it's the infamous "Apple" or "Pilot Inspektor"--without question.
Even though it is the American way to be able to choose whatever unique name or spelling of a name we want for children, I'm thinking maybe some people DO need to ask permission first. For example, one real-life couple named their child "Lemonjello!" First of all, what were they smoking when they thought of naming their child that? Were they inhaling powdered lemon Jell-O? In my middle school yearbook, I remember seeing a child whose name was "Seaborn Algae." He was an adorable little child, but I would like to know how many times he was made fun of for that name. I'm sure he has probably lost count by now.
The fact is, people need to take the naming of a baby seriously. They are going to be stuck with it the rest of their lives! It's not something that should be taken lightly or be given little thought. Denmark is quite extreme in its handling of the situation, but for some parents that don't have good judgment and plain old good sense, maybe I should name their baby for them. :-P ;)
Krystina, you gave a very kind response to my last poem post. You really are toooo polite! I thought it was terrible, but I'm glad you enjoyed it. hehe :)
Olyvia, you asked if there is anything else I do in my church besides sing in the choir. Yes, I am the "webmaster" and web designer for the church website. (Check it out if you wish--http://www.geocities.com/fumcpinehills.) I am the 'youth minister' even though, right now, we don't have a youth group, and I am the Sunday school teacher for the youth also. And during the summer, I teach a class at Vacation Bible School, and I'm kind of their official decorator for the event too, which is always fun. I'm also on the Leadership Committee and a couple of other committees. I think that pretty much covers it! :)
You also asked what grade I would like to teach and at what school, and for the grade part of that question (which everyone asks), I usually just say third grade because I like all of the grades, but 3rd is in the middle, so I just stick with that answer. I just started in my second placement for internship in a first grade class today (Monday, October 15). Already, I'm thinking I might change my tune and stick with the upper grades, but I'll explain that later in an upcoming blog. As for the school I'd like to teach in, I would like to go back to the school I attended - Ridgewood Park Elementary--which is a very troubled school to say the least. I also like Fern Creek, though, which is where I'm interning right now because, even though the students there have issues, the school is great and holds high expectations. But we'll see where God places me to teach.
Okay--even though my responses themselves took up a good chunk of my 20 minute blog requirement, I will now move on to the subject of the night... :-P
"What are you going to name him?" a friend asks a couple expecting a child.
"We were considering these," the pregnant woman exclaims, pointing to the names "Tylar" and "Taiylor" on the list of baby names the couple had compiled.
Well, according to an article (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/08/international/europe/08names.html?pagewanted=1&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Subjects/B/Babies&_r=3&oref=slogin) I recently read, Denmark might refuse to allow the parents to name their child either one of those names without written permission from a government review board because they are not typical names and definitely aren't typical spellings. I was kind of surprised when I read this article. Here in America, we can name babies whatever we want -- whether it's the infamous "Apple" or "Pilot Inspektor"--without question.
Even though it is the American way to be able to choose whatever unique name or spelling of a name we want for children, I'm thinking maybe some people DO need to ask permission first. For example, one real-life couple named their child "Lemonjello!" First of all, what were they smoking when they thought of naming their child that? Were they inhaling powdered lemon Jell-O? In my middle school yearbook, I remember seeing a child whose name was "Seaborn Algae." He was an adorable little child, but I would like to know how many times he was made fun of for that name. I'm sure he has probably lost count by now.
The fact is, people need to take the naming of a baby seriously. They are going to be stuck with it the rest of their lives! It's not something that should be taken lightly or be given little thought. Denmark is quite extreme in its handling of the situation, but for some parents that don't have good judgment and plain old good sense, maybe I should name their baby for them. :-P ;)
"I'm a Poet and Didn't Know It."
Posted by
Kristy Zabel's Blog
comments (1)
At my internship, some famous(?) poet came and talked to students about poetry. I had never heard of her before, but then again, I'm not a poetry person. Her name was Sarah Holbrook, and she gave kids some good strategies and pointers on how to write their own poems, so...I figured I'd try my hand at it tonight for this blog.
First, she said to create a small list of things having to do with a particular topic or place and at the same time, try to keep in mind words that will rhyme with the words you thought of:
stress (mess, success)
assignment
class (pass)
book (cook, shook, took)
blog (jog, hog, dog)
Next, she said to come up with a few sentences using some of the words from the list and using some sort of poetry pattern for rhyming. (I will use A B C B , which means the last words in the second and fourth line will rhyme.)
A. Here I am writing my third blog
B. I have so much to do in just this one week
C. I am quite overwhelmed and tired.
B. A little bit of rest is what I seek.
A. I have assignments to do for each and every class;
B. It's very hectic right now, and it causes me great stress.
C. I'm ready for a break--
B. I need at least a long weekend and nothing less.
A. This semester has been so busy--
B. I can't wait to be done with all that is due.
C. How I wish my classes were over with
B. It would feel so wonderful just to be through.
A. Now I must end this awful poem
B. And move on to another thing I've been assigned.
C. With so much to do, which should I choose?
B. I have to stay focused and not lose my mind.
Ok, sorry, folks, that was pretty darn bad. Good thing my 20 minutes are up! Well, I'm off to do other stuff now... :-P
First, she said to create a small list of things having to do with a particular topic or place and at the same time, try to keep in mind words that will rhyme with the words you thought of:
stress (mess, success)
assignment
class (pass)
book (cook, shook, took)
blog (jog, hog, dog)
Next, she said to come up with a few sentences using some of the words from the list and using some sort of poetry pattern for rhyming. (I will use A B C B , which means the last words in the second and fourth line will rhyme.)
A. Here I am writing my third blog
B. I have so much to do in just this one week
C. I am quite overwhelmed and tired.
B. A little bit of rest is what I seek.
A. I have assignments to do for each and every class;
B. It's very hectic right now, and it causes me great stress.
C. I'm ready for a break--
B. I need at least a long weekend and nothing less.
A. This semester has been so busy--
B. I can't wait to be done with all that is due.
C. How I wish my classes were over with
B. It would feel so wonderful just to be through.
A. Now I must end this awful poem
B. And move on to another thing I've been assigned.
C. With so much to do, which should I choose?
B. I have to stay focused and not lose my mind.
Ok, sorry, folks, that was pretty darn bad. Good thing my 20 minutes are up! Well, I'm off to do other stuff now... :-P
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
